Ann: Operational Update, page-258

If this was the case it does make sense to make the decision to move with the macro market . But does this mean the board intentionally bled out the business with excessive costs for the sole reason of aiding the open short positions? Theyve started to focus on cost cutting now but why now? Why not 12 months ago? Imo it's because lithium short was in full force and they understood there's more money to be made moving with the macro lithium ebb and flow. At the cost of the shareholder of course.

But is there a potential lithium powerhouse here still?