88E 33.3% 0.2¢ 88 energy limited

db: Why would the stress profile/high pore pressure make them...

  1. Ya
    6,809 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 3829
    db:
    Why would the stress profile/high pore pressure make them decide to not bother with the micro-stim?

    --------------

    B'coz reservoir pressure is y'r friend when it comes to flow (ie psi/ft.

    If it was a conventional reservoir u'd look at porosity, perm etc which should b there from the wireline logs.

    Imaging Tool scan of the formation should have given them a good idea of the zones with fractures etc (ie pathways) & the stress profile around the wellbore. These zones r the ones that frac easily (since the matrix is low in clay & reasonably high in silica hence the 'brittleness' - 5 second elevator pitch on Rock mechanics 101) act as pathways for fluid to flowback.

    They've saved a bit of time & money by avoiding the microstim. Pressure data is usually attained from a MDT tool (ie psi/ft) when a fluid sample is collected in a Sample Chamber & then analysed for its GOR, Specific Gravity etc. They haven't reported any GOR yet, so will b interesting to see the final ratio post testing.

    They've also mentioned during IW#1 about Over pressure. So given the depth & matrix of the HRZ which should b same as IW#1, high stress conditions which makes it easy to frac, presence of organic matter & any gas seen during drilling etc, they see reasonably confident about skipping the micro-stim's. So fingers crossed for a safe frac job.

    Next few steps r straight-fwd.

    - They'll get the trucks lined up once a Test interval is selected & all OK is received from AOG,
    - Start pumping the frac fluid (ie xx bbls/minutes) to create the reqd fractures &
    - Shut the well in,
    - Let the pressure buildup,
    - Monitor the pressure on the well head
    - Then come back in a few days & open the well
    - do a flow back thro' a small choke size setting
    - collect all fluids for PVT analysis etc & update mkt about bopd's etc

    Choke sizes for Shale flowbacks r crucial, as u dont want to crank up a 1" diameter (ie 64/64) choke as that will stuff up the reservoir (ie give a rapid decline).

    Norm these days is to go for a 10/64 or 22/64 setting should b optimum, although they'll try all sorts of choke settings & settle for the optimum one to avoid rapid reservoir decline. Hope this helps. GLTA.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add 88E (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
0.2¢
Change
-0.001(33.3%)
Mkt cap ! $57.78M
Open High Low Value Volume
0.3¢ 0.3¢ 0.2¢ $5.997K 2.378M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
222 347388030 0.2¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
0.3¢ 601584897 215
View Market Depth
Last trade - 15.51pm 19/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
88E (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.