db:
Why would the stress profile/high pore pressure make them decide to not bother with the micro-stim?
--------------
B'coz reservoir pressure is y'r friend when it comes to flow (ie psi/ft.
If it was a conventional reservoir u'd look at porosity, perm etc which should b there from the wireline logs.
Imaging Tool scan of the formation should have given them a good idea of the zones with fractures etc (ie pathways) & the stress profile around the wellbore. These zones r the ones that frac easily (since the matrix is low in clay & reasonably high in silica hence the 'brittleness' - 5 second elevator pitch on Rock mechanics 101) act as pathways for fluid to flowback.
They've saved a bit of time & money by avoiding the microstim. Pressure data is usually attained from a MDT tool (ie psi/ft) when a fluid sample is collected in a Sample Chamber & then analysed for its GOR, Specific Gravity etc. They haven't reported any GOR yet, so will b interesting to see the final ratio post testing.
They've also mentioned during IW#1 about Over pressure. So given the depth & matrix of the HRZ which should b same as IW#1, high stress conditions which makes it easy to frac, presence of organic matter & any gas seen during drilling etc, they see reasonably confident about skipping the micro-stim's. So fingers crossed for a safe frac job.
Next few steps r straight-fwd.
- They'll get the trucks lined up once a Test interval is selected & all OK is received from AOG,
- Start pumping the frac fluid (ie xx bbls/minutes) to create the reqd fractures &
- Shut the well in,
- Let the pressure buildup,
- Monitor the pressure on the well head
- Then come back in a few days & open the well
- do a flow back thro' a small choke size setting
- collect all fluids for PVT analysis etc & update mkt about bopd's etc
Choke sizes for Shale flowbacks r crucial, as u dont want to crank up a 1" diameter (ie 64/64) choke as that will stuff up the reservoir (ie give a rapid decline).
Norm these days is to go for a 10/64 or 22/64 setting should b optimum, although they'll try all sorts of choke settings & settle for the optimum one to avoid rapid reservoir decline. Hope this helps. GLTA.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Operations Update
db: Why would the stress profile/high pore pressure make them...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add 88E (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.001(25.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $72.33M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.2¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $5.805K | 2.894M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
93 | 109415193 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 565713746 | 228 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
92 | 109365193 | 0.002 |
496 | 1249771325 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 544703746 | 225 |
0.004 | 186690719 | 118 |
0.005 | 111000055 | 47 |
0.006 | 38141234 | 37 |
0.007 | 39505108 | 24 |
Last trade - 15.43pm 30/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
88E (ASX) Chart |