Ask them what they mean that the well offers protection to existing reserves. The contra then holds that without the well the existing reserves are unprotected and subject to a decrease. I don’t have their models or the external company who certifies but it’s a strange comment to put in the statement and then not explain.
Ask them what they mean that the well offers protection to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add OEL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $62.33M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.3¢ | 1.3¢ | 1.3¢ | $4.537K | 348.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | 12486048 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3¢ | 14711861 | 16 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| OEL (ASX) Chart |