I read it as CHM get 10m x 1.50 for Grimildi transaction and it also reads that the judge threw out the constructive case against MMX and awarded CHM a fundicary fee instead. Noting that CHm made up 24% of original purchase price of jack hills and the judge said MMX have to account to CHM for the income dirived for that investment. No where does it say CHM now have 24/25 % of Jack Hills.
I read it as CHM get 10m x 1.50 for Grimildi transaction and it...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.060M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | $19.57K | 4.893M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 419507 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5¢ | 18587873 | 22 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.59pm 27/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CHM (ASX) Chart |