I'm reasoning in the following way:
- Confidentiality could not have been demanded by Alliance because that would have been in conflict with public disclosure requirements for a public company
- Confidentiality requires the party demanding it to bring something to the table
- Therefore H/Q must bring something to the table
Any problem with this logic?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- ann out
ann out, page-37
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)