I've been looking through more of the data in greater detail.
It's starting to look like each of these ore sheets has its own "signature" uniqueness.
Unfortunately we don't get a full breakdown of the mineralisation at DDH05, 08 & 09 for example.
If you go and breakdown the layers (as I've done for you below) you'll see a high grade section inside each of these 3 holes, with the Cu content in the 2.29 - 2.5% range & Ag in the 29.7 - 47.3 g/t range. The surrounds (top & bottom) aren't broken down into there actual grade, but if you treat them as being equal the Cu number works out between 0.67 - 0.93% and the Ag to just between 2.7 - 11.7 g/t.
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Column 6
Column 7
Column 8
0
08
132
9
0.93
11.7
1
141
22
2.29
29
2
163
10
0.93
11.7
3
41.0
1.66
21.0
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Column 6
Column 7
Column 8
0
05
161
16
0.67
6.68
1
177
6.28
2.5
47.3
2
183.3
12.6
0.67
6.68
3
34.85
1.00
14.0
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Column 6
Column 7
Column 8
0
09
165
9
0.85
2.78
1
174
12
2.31
41
2
186
0.61
0.83
2.65
3
21.6
1.66
24.00
Obviously the upper & lower layers won't actually be the exact same as above, but it does illustrate the point.
If you look at this part of DDH03
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Column 6
Column 7
0
03
174.9
18.4
1.06
You might say that it's on the very outer edge of the ore sheet with no ( or virtually no high grade centre). The Moly numbers from it also indicate it's unlikely to be from the same ore sheet.
We need more assay data, but its looking like this could be a very substantial ore sheet. Unfortunately going by there drilling plan we're going to be waiting quite a while as holes DDH26 to 31 have yet to be drilled and will prove whether these observations are true or not.
LOTM
MOD Price at posting:
2.5¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
