Hi Prime1, well that does seem like a fair cost difference based on those numbers, it makes me wonder whether companies will be prepared to pay it just for an extra bit of "greenness", is that a word? Can they remain competitive against their competitors if they do?
From what I can gather the SYR process is heaps more environmentally friendly than synthetic, MNS process may be a little bit greener again? But cost benefit analysis on that extra little bit of "greenness" I still wonder about. Seems like such a big cost advantage SYR has, certainly look forward to reading further posts on this topic, most informative.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MNS
- Ann: Outstanding Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Results-MNS.AX
Ann: Outstanding Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Results-MNS.AX, page-161
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable