IMO. DYOR. 1.Resource and Reserve AssessmentGrade...

IMO. DYOR.

1.Resource and Reserve Assessment

Grade ofResource

• Average Grade: Laboratory analysis indicates an average TiO₂ content of 63.4%-65%, with a high rutile concentration of up to 21%. Rutile is a premium titanium mineral due to its high TiO₂ content and applications in pigments, alloys, and electronics.
• Comparison to Industry Benchmarks: The high TiO₂ grades are comparable to industry-leading deposits, with significant contributions from rutile, anatase (4-7%), and pseudo-rutile (68-70%).
• High-Grade Zones: Heavy mineral (HM) concentrations in composite samples from the upper horizon reached 12.0%-12.5%, indicating economically favourable zones.

Resource Size and Classification

• Total Resources: Initial drilling and analysis suggest an 8km x 2km mineralized area. Expanded exploration aims to delineate the full extent.
• Deposit Breakdown: Two flat-lying, high-grade heavy mineral sheets are identified within a broader zone.
• Confidence Levels: Current results rely on historical drill data with limited high-confidence classifications; additional data from ongoing drilling will refine these estimates.

Reserves and Mine Life

• Proven and Probable Reserves: Not yet calculated; the project is in an early exploratory phase.
• Mine Life: Depends on further exploration; the shallow nature of the deposits suggests potential for long-term, cost-effective extraction.
• Exploration Potential: Ongoing drilling programs, covering an expanded area, aim to confirm additional reserves.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Reliance on Historic Data: Early reliance on historic drill holes introduces uncertainty, as these may not fully represent broader deposit characteristics.
• Reserve Consistency: Additional drilling and metallurgical testing are required to verify grades and continuity.

2.Feasibility and Costs

Feasibility Study

• Status: Pre-feasibility activities are ongoing. Initial results indicate promising mineral grades, but full feasibility metrics (NPV, IRR) are not yet available.
• Key Findings: Heavy mineral separation tests highlight high-value concentrates with low deleterious elements.

Capital Expenditure (CapEx)

• Estimate: Pre-production CapEx is yet to be determined. The shallow nature of deposits may reduce infrastructure costs.

Operating Costs (OpEx)

• Estimate: Detailed cost estimates such as AISC (All-In Sustaining Costs) or C1 cash costs are pending.

Breakeven Price

• Current Status: Breakeven analysis depends on completion of feasibility studies and determination of operating costs.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Cost projections are pending and subject to revision as exploration progresses.

3.Revenue and Profitability

Financial Metrics

• Projected Metrics: No detailed NPV or IRR calculations are available due to the project’s early stage.

Assumptions

• Commodity Prices: Future analysis will depend on realistic titanium market price projections, expected to remain strong due to increasing demand.
• Exchange Rates and Inflation: Assumptions yet to be defined in feasibility studies.

Hedging Strategies

• No specific price risk mitigation strategies (e.g., hedging) have been reported.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Dependence on optimistic price forecasts and sensitivity to market volatility could impact financial projections.

4.Timeline and Milestones

Development Schedule

• Key Milestones:
  • Ongoing drilling and analysis with initial results expected in 3-6 weeks.
  • Metallurgical test work results anticipated over 4-8 weeks.
• Timeline Realism: The project’s timeline appears realistic but may face delays depending on laboratory and regulatory processes.

Past Performance

• The company has successfully completed initial drilling programs, indicating its capacity to adhere to schedules.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• External Dependencies: Timelines depend on laboratory throughput and potential delays in permitting.

5.Geological and Technical Risks

Geological Models

• Mineralization: Flat-lying marine placer-style heavy mineral sands, well-suited to mining.
• Geological Understanding: Models are supported by mapping, historical data, and initial drilling.

Mining Method

• Proposed Methods: Open-pit mining is likely, given the shallow depth of mineralization (<10m).
• Suitability: The proposed method aligns with the deposit type and industry practices.

Metallurgical Challenges

• Recovery Rates: Laboratory tests indicate high TiO₂ recovery potential, but more data are required to confirm processing viability.
• Processing Risks: The presence of fines in the lower mineralized zone may pose challenges.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Additional testing is required to confirm recovery rates, metallurgical processes, and economic feasibility.

6.Infrastructure and Logistics

Proximity to Infrastructure

• Located near pastoral stations, suggesting manageable logistical challenges.
• Accessible via established routes, but proximity to key infrastructure like power and water is unclear.

Development Requirements

• No major infrastructure investments have been reported.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Remote location in the Woomera Prohibited Area could introduce unforeseen logistical complexities.

7.Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Factors

Permitting and Compliance

• Status: Licenses and permits are in place; the tenements are in good standing.

Community Engagement

• Status: Community agreements have not been explicitly detailed.

Environmental Impact

• Mitigation Strategies: Minimal liabilities reported, with expected low-impact mining methods.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Long-term environmental impacts and community concerns require further clarification.

8.Management and Team

Experience and Track Record

• The team has experience in critical mineral exploration, including titanium and copper deposits.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Management experience in transitioning from exploration to production is unclear.

9.Financing and Ownership

Funding Status

• Current Funding: Staged farm-in agreements with potential for increased ownership.
• Terms: 100% ownership of some tenements; JV agreements in place for others.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Long-term funding stability depends on the successful completion of farm-in agreements.

10.Market and Economic Context

Commodity Market

• Titanium is classified as a critical mineral, with applications in green technologies and steel alloys.

Supply-Demand Dynamics

• Market forecasts indicate strong demand, driven by electric vehicles and renewable energy sectors.

Geopolitical Risks

• Located in South Australia, a stable mining jurisdiction with low geopolitical risk.

11.Competitive Position

Benchmarking

• High-grade TiO₂ and rutile concentrations position the project competitively.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Competitive advantages depend on further exploration and resource confirmation.

12. Exit Strategy

Monetisation Path

• Options include production, JV expansion, or asset sale.

Long-Term Vision

• Continued exploration potential for critical mineral resources.

Limitations and Inconsistencies

• Exit strategies are still in early conceptual stages.

Conclusion

The Project represents a viable investment with promising geological potential and favourable economic and market conditions. Minor risks exist, including reliance on historic data, pending cost analysis, and undefined exit strategies. These are manageable with further exploration and feasibility studies.