The bare minimum for metallurgy should include the head grade assays (including deleterious elements) and the tails. It's also pertinent to mention what you sampled and how you treated it. It's not rocket science and it's not patented information that you might, you know, froth float carbonates out of mud. I've gone back through all their metallurgy disclosures and they're all of this quality; just random word salad and no facts.
For comparison of what I consider to be good metallurgy disclosures, DEG, TMT, LRS, E25, to name a few.
Ann: OUTSTANDING METALLURGICAL RESULTS FOR BIG SANDY LITHIUM, page-96
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AZL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.5¢ |
Change
-0.001(6.25%) |
Mkt cap ! $67.10M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.6¢ | 1.7¢ | 1.5¢ | $44.90K | 2.827M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 31 | 9743154 | 1.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6¢ | 407432 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AZL (ASX) Chart |