Those p values are absolutely fantastic for such a small study. Just because a particular measure doesn't reach statistical significance in a small study doesn't mean the effect isn't real. Formally, a p value of 0.0647 for MB-CDI Total Vocab for example means the improvement had a 6.47% chance of happening randomly rather than being real. Given the totality of the results, I would expect these measures to reach statistical significance in a larger P3 trial.
Those p values are absolutely fantastic for such a small study....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 170 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NEU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$12.25 |
Change
-0.100(0.81%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.565B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $12.20 | $12.25 | $12.02 | $3.677M | 302.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1579 | $12.21 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $12.26 | 1199 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NEU (ASX) Chart |