I never mentioned SYA, i was responding to "peers". My point is...

I never mentioned SYA, i was responding to "peers". My point is who are the peers being referred to? I get the point of being +4 years off production, time/money/macro risk, but inferring that [insert company] is better because of a lower market cap or in fact being near term itself doesn't mean something is better. However i thinking comparing companies with >100mt at >1% would be a great debate. There are many educated mining/institutional opinions (certainly I don't qualify with anyone of those) that think pmt/pmet is cheap based on price/t in ground and their opinion that pmt will be a top 3 global resource. We'll see what the drill bit finds.