I would love for this to be the case, but the announcement specifically indicates that the SeaBee formation showed ~no~ oil shows.
why mention both if it's a mistype? also, 88E announced 26th feb that the Nanashuk targets were 4500 which this aligns with.
it begs the question why partners on the same drill are reporting the targets to be at different depths, which completely changes the status of the drill/potential results too...
I think, sadly, the last Hope is Torok... which was a secondary target. not promising (speculation and IMO only)
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- 88E
- Ann: Pause in Trading
Ann: Pause in Trading, page-110
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
AVH
Avita boosts skin restoration product portfolio with 'dermal matrix' – a kind of next-level gauze made of fake skin
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
MTL
Mantle Minerals' Nick Poll talks to HotCopper on finding gold grades up to 3.57g/t at Mt Berghaus
Add 88E (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(33.3%) |
Mkt cap ! $57.86M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.2¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $6.857K | 3.073M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
289 | 346631721 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 573714669 | 217 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
288 | 336631721 | 0.002 |
248 | 881126186 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 553714669 | 216 |
0.004 | 286826186 | 117 |
0.005 | 81618012 | 59 |
0.006 | 29302656 | 32 |
0.007 | 25722782 | 21 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 02/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
88E (ASX) Chart |