PCL pancontinental energy nl

If a major were to drill two separate wells—one targeting Oryx...

  1. 5 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 7

    If a major were to drill two separate wells—one targeting Oryx and the other targeting Hyrax—the figures from the document break down as follows:

    Oryx Single Well

    • Gross Recoverable Resources (Best Case): 534 MMbbls
    • GCoS: 22.5%
    • Risked Recoverable Estimate:
        534 MMbbls × 22.5% ≈ 120 MMbbls

    Hyrax Single Well

    • Gross Recoverable Resources (Best Case): 534 MMbbls
    • GCoS: 19.7%
    • Risked Recoverable Estimate:
        534 MMbbls × 19.7% ≈ 105 MMbbls

    Combined Analysis

    • Total Combined Risked Resources:
        ≈ 120 MMbbls + 105 MMbbls = 225 MMbbls

    • Individual Well Success Probabilities:
        Oryx: 22.5% chance of success
        Hyrax: 19.7% chance of success

    • Probability of Hitting Oil in at Least One Well:
        If we assume the two wells are independent, the chance that a given well fails is:
        • Oryx failure: 77.5% (1 – 22.5%)
        • Hyrax failure: 80.3% (1 – 19.7%)
        The probability both fail is:
          0.775 × 0.803 ≈ 0.622 (or 62.2%)
        Thus, the chance that at least one well is successful is:
          1 – 0.622 ≈ 38%

    Summary

    Drilling two single wells—one on Oryx and one on Hyrax—yields a combined risked resource potential of approximately 225 MMbbls (when weighting the best-case recoverable volumes by their respective GCoS) and an overall probability of roughly 38% that at least one well will encounter oil.

    These estimates provide a simplified risk assessment that assumes independence between the prospects, and they serve as a useful gauge for evaluating a dual-well drilling campaign offshore Namibia.

    Multi‐Target Well (Oryx, Calypso, Addax Channel)

    Gross Recoverable Estimates (100%):
    • Oryx: 168 (Low) / 534 (Best) / 1,541 (High) MMbbls with a GCoS of 22.5%
    • Addax Channel: 26 (Low) / 102 (Best) / 487 (High) MMbbls with a GCoS of 16.3%
    • Calypso: 4 (Low) / 34 (Best) / 134 (High) MMbbls with a GCoS of 19.4%

    Combined Totals:
    • Gross Recoverable Best Case: 534 + 102 + 34 = 670 MMbbls
    • Weighted Average GCoS:
     – Calculate each product using best-case values:
      Oryx: 534 × 22.5% ≈ 120.15
      Addax Channel: 102 × 16.3% ≈ 16.63
      Calypso: 34 × 19.4% ≈ 6.60
     – Sum: 120.15 + 16.63 + 6.60 ≈ 143.38
     – Divide by total best-case (670 MMbbls): 143.38 / 670 ≈ 21.4%

    Chance of Success for Multi‐Target Well:
    Assuming independence among targets, the failure chance for each is (1 – GCoS):
    • Oryx: 77.5%
    • Addax Channel: 83.7%
    • Calypso: 80.6%

    The probability that all three fail is approximately:
      0.775 × 0.837 × 0.806 ≈ 52.3%
    Thus, the chance that at least one target is successful is about:
      100% – 52.3% ≈ 47.7%

    Standalone Hyrax Prospect

    Gross Recoverable Estimates (100%):
    • Hyrax: 122 (Low) / 534 (Best) / 1,417 (High) MMbbls
    • GCoS: 19.7%

    For a separate well on Hyrax, the chance of success is directly the GCoS: approximately 19.7%.

    Combined Drilling Campaign

    If the operator drills both a multi‐target well and a separate Hyrax well—assuming the outcomes are independent—the probability that neither well encounters oil is:

      (1 – 47.7%) × (1 – 19.7%) ≈ 52.3% × 80.3% ≈ 42.0%

    Thus, the chance of at least one well being successful is:

      100% – 42.0% ≈ 58%

    Risked Resource Estimates

    When weighting the best-case recoverable figures by the GCoS, the “risked” recoverable resources are estimated as:

    • Multi‐Target Well: 670 MMbbls × 21.4% ≈ 143 MMbbls
    • Hyrax Well: 534 MMbbls × 19.7% ≈ 105 MMbbls

    This gives a combined risked resource of roughly 248 MMbbls if both prospects prove to be productive.

    Summary

    A major operator might propose drilling:

    1. A multi‐target well testing the Oryx, Calypso, and Addax Channel leads with an estimated gross recoverable resource of about 670 MMbbls (weighted to roughly 143 MMbbls risked) and a ~48% chance of success for at least one target;
    2. A separate well on the Hyrax prospect with around 534 MMbbls gross (approximately 105 MMbbls risked) and a 19.7% success chance.



    When combined, the overall probability of hitting oil in at least one of the wells is approximately 58%, and the integrated risked resource potential would be on the order of 248 MMbbls.

    These figures provide a compelling rationale for a dual drilling campaign that balances risk across multiple targets while maximizing the chance of a commercially significant discovery.

    Hi all,

    sorry about the order of the message, I am posting from my phone.

    Following on from the big kick in the guts this week I was wondering about the viability of this prospect for PCL. Regarding our two main leads orynx and hyrax. PS I have no geo experience and this is my first oil exploration stock.

    I plugged in the resource estimate file to chat gpts deep reasoning model and this is what I got. Would be great to get opinions from from more experienced posters too and encourage further discussion regarding what factors might make Pcl attractive to super majors IE risk v reward.

    Here is what I got from the deep reasoning model, hope it can prompt some further conversation:
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
1.0¢
Change
-0.001(9.09%)
Mkt cap ! $81.36M
Open High Low Value Volume
1.0¢ 1.1¢ 1.0¢ $27.35K 2.727M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
12 11603800 1.0¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
1.1¢ 7012944 11
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 16/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
PCL (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.