If a major were to drill two separate wells—one targeting Oryx and the other targeting Hyrax—the figures from the document break down as follows:
Oryx Single Well
- Gross Recoverable Resources (Best Case): 534 MMbbls
- GCoS: 22.5%
- Risked Recoverable Estimate:
534 MMbbls × 22.5% ≈ 120 MMbblsHyrax Single Well
- Gross Recoverable Resources (Best Case): 534 MMbbls
- GCoS: 19.7%
- Risked Recoverable Estimate:
534 MMbbls × 19.7% ≈ 105 MMbblsCombined Analysis
Total Combined Risked Resources:
≈ 120 MMbbls + 105 MMbbls = 225 MMbblsIndividual Well Success Probabilities:
Oryx: 22.5% chance of success
Hyrax: 19.7% chance of successProbability of Hitting Oil in at Least One Well:
If we assume the two wells are independent, the chance that a given well fails is:
• Oryx failure: 77.5% (1 – 22.5%)
• Hyrax failure: 80.3% (1 – 19.7%)
The probability both fail is:
0.775 × 0.803 ≈ 0.622 (or 62.2%)
Thus, the chance that at least one well is successful is:
1 – 0.622 ≈ 38%Summary
Drilling two single wells—one on Oryx and one on Hyrax—yields a combined risked resource potential of approximately 225 MMbbls (when weighting the best-case recoverable volumes by their respective GCoS) and an overall probability of roughly 38% that at least one well will encounter oil.
These estimates provide a simplified risk assessment that assumes independence between the prospects, and they serve as a useful gauge for evaluating a dual-well drilling campaign offshore Namibia.
Multi‐Target Well (Oryx, Calypso, Addax Channel)Gross Recoverable Estimates (100%):
• Oryx: 168 (Low) / 534 (Best) / 1,541 (High) MMbbls with a GCoS of 22.5%
• Addax Channel: 26 (Low) / 102 (Best) / 487 (High) MMbbls with a GCoS of 16.3%
• Calypso: 4 (Low) / 34 (Best) / 134 (High) MMbbls with a GCoS of 19.4%Combined Totals:
• Gross Recoverable Best Case: 534 + 102 + 34 = 670 MMbbls
• Weighted Average GCoS:
– Calculate each product using best-case values:
Oryx: 534 × 22.5% ≈ 120.15
Addax Channel: 102 × 16.3% ≈ 16.63
Calypso: 34 × 19.4% ≈ 6.60
– Sum: 120.15 + 16.63 + 6.60 ≈ 143.38
– Divide by total best-case (670 MMbbls): 143.38 / 670 ≈ 21.4%Chance of Success for Multi‐Target Well:
Assuming independence among targets, the failure chance for each is (1 – GCoS):
• Oryx: 77.5%
• Addax Channel: 83.7%
• Calypso: 80.6%The probability that all three fail is approximately:
0.775 × 0.837 × 0.806 ≈ 52.3%
Thus, the chance that at least one target is successful is about:
100% – 52.3% ≈ 47.7%Standalone Hyrax Prospect
Gross Recoverable Estimates (100%):
• Hyrax: 122 (Low) / 534 (Best) / 1,417 (High) MMbbls
• GCoS: 19.7%For a separate well on Hyrax, the chance of success is directly the GCoS: approximately 19.7%.
Combined Drilling Campaign
If the operator drills both a multi‐target well and a separate Hyrax well—assuming the outcomes are independent—the probability that neither well encounters oil is:
(1 – 47.7%) × (1 – 19.7%) ≈ 52.3% × 80.3% ≈ 42.0%
Thus, the chance of at least one well being successful is:
100% – 42.0% ≈ 58%
Risked Resource Estimates
When weighting the best-case recoverable figures by the GCoS, the “risked” recoverable resources are estimated as:
- Multi‐Target Well: 670 MMbbls × 21.4% ≈ 143 MMbbls
- Hyrax Well: 534 MMbbls × 19.7% ≈ 105 MMbbls
This gives a combined risked resource of roughly 248 MMbbls if both prospects prove to be productive.
Summary
A major operator might propose drilling:
- A multi‐target well testing the Oryx, Calypso, and Addax Channel leads with an estimated gross recoverable resource of about 670 MMbbls (weighted to roughly 143 MMbbls risked) and a ~48% chance of success for at least one target;
- A separate well on the Hyrax prospect with around 534 MMbbls gross (approximately 105 MMbbls risked) and a 19.7% success chance.
When combined, the overall probability of hitting oil in at least one of the wells is approximately 58%, and the integrated risked resource potential would be on the order of 248 MMbbls.
These figures provide a compelling rationale for a dual drilling campaign that balances risk across multiple targets while maximizing the chance of a commercially significant discovery.
Hi all,
sorry about the order of the message, I am posting from my phone.
Following on from the big kick in the guts this week I was wondering about the viability of this prospect for PCL. Regarding our two main leads orynx and hyrax. PS I have no geo experience and this is my first oil exploration stock.
I plugged in the resource estimate file to chat gpts deep reasoning model and this is what I got. Would be great to get opinions from from more experienced posters too and encourage further discussion regarding what factors might make Pcl attractive to super majors IE risk v reward.
Here is what I got from the deep reasoning model, hope it can prompt some further conversation:
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: PEL 87 Project Prospective Resources
PCL
pancontinental energy nl
Add to My Watchlist
9.09%
!
1.0¢

If a major were to drill two separate wells—one targeting Oryx...
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
1.0¢ |
Change
-0.001(9.09%) |
Mkt cap ! $81.36M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.0¢ | 1.1¢ | 1.0¢ | $27.35K | 2.727M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
12 | 11603800 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.1¢ | 7012944 | 11 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
11 | 10603800 | 0.010 |
25 | 8460723 | 0.009 |
20 | 5327862 | 0.008 |
9 | 3009691 | 0.007 |
6 | 11048332 | 0.006 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.011 | 7012944 | 11 |
0.012 | 6000615 | 12 |
0.013 | 3761243 | 9 |
0.014 | 2326227 | 7 |
0.015 | 1371302 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 16/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PCL (ASX) Chart |