Not that it matters, but I disagree. I think optionality is important however I concede that it's irrelevant in this market. But it's blue sky upside in a booming market, my logic being that friction costs are already paid (PFS shares/dilution) and as I saw it, our cash position is not one of stress. So I WOULD have kept it for optionality purposes. But, an open mind is a fairer approach, as if a better resource can be found for sane (optionality) purpose, who am I to disagree?
But, this is a vague attempt only to sell. Seems to me also a good way to hold off on getting a PFS out which would otherwise be due. Do we realistic think any suitors will take it off our hands in this market? I don't.
Heads down, bums up, watch CLA/AUZ and and wait for Uranium to recover. It will happen. Buckleys knows when, but it has to soon enough or US reactors get turned down in 20/21 amongst what I see as an energy consuming time in the USA.
This to me right now, in this format - isn't news. Intention to sell something no one will buy at worst time in market. The linear progression of logic to that is to go and pay top dollar for a resource at the top of the market. I wouldn't do it, so my gut tells me they won't either, but I'd like at least to think theyd have another (better?) option up there sleeve before ink dried on any said contract.
I don't see holding costs as an obstacle while we are in our cash generating position.
But if I had to impart any logic, and that's still to shut your eyes to the SP and look at the underlying business of PEN. Ripe for U price improvement upside. Nothing has changed here, although (to me) if we sold Karoo I see downside bias from my perspective. It doesn't make me right, it's just my opinion. Similarly, show me a better resource to slip in its place and I'll change my mind. Sensible executive management shouldn't sell Karoo (which is a elephant with a plausible path to mining in 10 years) without an option to insert in its place. I'd have to expect this logic should be consistent at a management level. I don't see a buyer at this point, it doesn't seem plausible.
Cheers and good luck and wishes all.
Gav
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PEN
- Ann: Peninsula looks to divest its interest in the Karoo Projects
Ann: Peninsula looks to divest its interest in the Karoo Projects, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PEN (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
7.4¢ |
Change
-0.007(8.13%) |
Mkt cap ! $234.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
7.7¢ | 7.7¢ | 7.3¢ | $1.355M | 18.09M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
34 | 2365701 | 7.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
7.4¢ | 808684 | 16 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
32 | 2290500 | 0.073 |
22 | 810730 | 0.072 |
21 | 1505052 | 0.071 |
24 | 2851396 | 0.070 |
6 | 749688 | 0.069 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.074 | 818524 | 16 |
0.075 | 922848 | 8 |
0.076 | 603616 | 8 |
0.077 | 462107 | 7 |
0.078 | 394978 | 6 |
Last trade - 14.02pm 04/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PEN (ASX) Chart |