Everyone keeps saying this is an "insurance policy" but it absolutely is not worded that way. They have a current permit that they did not complete and if they get a new extension/variation then it is possible that a legal challenge could occur based on them not meeting their existing permit scope of works.
By extended in the existing permit, there is no chance of a challenge based on not meeting their scope.
It seems like this is to close a loophole prior to the new variation being granted.
Everyone keeps saying this is an "insurance policy" but it...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 245 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $25.24M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 96181 | 2.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9¢ | 3000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.27pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BPH (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable