Correct, as far as my understanding goes...we are looking for a...

Correct, as far as my understanding goes...we are looking for a long, wide, shallow resource that can be easily scooped up and processed. Anyone feel free to correct this, but say only a third of the 9km strike length shows 1m deep, 10m wide mineralisation at 25%. I'll use a very rough conservative soil weight of 2tonnes/m3. This comes to 15Mt of Mn. In reality we might get less length, more width, more depth, etc, but very rough numbers demonstrate order of magnitude. Remember they have measured a 5% background Mn mineralisation in the soil as well. And kudos to you for a rare HC event...a correction to a previous post!