it would be good to hear opinions from qualified radiologists on the imaging (if safe, non-toxic, has not side effects and it’s a clear indication between non malignant vs malignant tumours to qualified imaging specialists why the need to worry about further trials?)
it’s first mover so might keep continuing to sell nano particles to prospective partners in collaboration…
they’ve given up on the new imaging specialist equipment (hence the loss of speculative attractiveness here in the stock)
Still have a few in here so hope there is still some hype left
it would be good to hear opinions from qualified radiologists on...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
