I think this is strong confirmation that additional vitamin E compared to base feeds are definitely warranted and beneficial. The question as you say is how much better is our Vitamin E derivative compared to other Vitman Es.
From the figures shown TPM although not statistically significant showed a trend of higher rate of improvement and as Ross suggests 1% can make a big difference financially.
The question I have is in regards to how TPM had been used here. It appears as purely an additive or an 'ingredient'.
What I'd like to see is, apart from assessing the impact of TPM as a bulk raw vitamin e ingredient, is to see it used as a enhanced deliverer of specific ingredients in a targeted formula aimed at improving LWG or fertility etc.
Lets exploit both the vitamin and delivery aspects of TPM to further boost results.
Hopefully these results pique enough interest for someone to collaborate to run further trials as both a bulk ingredient and a formulated product.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVE
- Ann: Phosphagenics Poultry Feed Study Reports Positive Data
Ann: Phosphagenics Poultry Feed Study Reports Positive Data, page-12
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVE (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(33.3%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.338M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.2¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $16.54K | 5.758M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
59 | 96791453 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 58594028 | 16 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
59 | 96791453 | 0.002 |
23 | 74000508 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 58594028 | 16 |
0.004 | 22905524 | 20 |
0.005 | 20469333 | 10 |
0.006 | 20865067 | 11 |
0.007 | 10865221 | 9 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 02/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AVE (ASX) Chart |