Just wondering the basis for you comment that SKI walked away from AUZ as BB did not support SKI taking up a shareholding as I have not heard that previously - Equity was a major plank in the non binding offtake proposal and from the shareholders point of view at the time the proposed entry price was market aligned.
Having SKI as a major shareholder would have ensured Sconi proceeded benefiting shareholders, the BOD and ultimately Australian exports - I can't imagine the FIRB would have objected to a 30% equity position by SKI.
The SKI deal would have made the BOD and BB very wealthy given their share/option holding, would have given AUZ the ability to progress to mining and benefited all shareholders in terms of AUZ's share price and future - why on earth would BB not have supported SKI as a core shareholder and for that matter why would the BOD not do so even in BB objected.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AUZ
- Ann: Pilot P-CAM production plant enters construction phase
Ann: Pilot P-CAM production plant enters construction phase, page-69
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AUZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $10.48M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | $1.118K | 139.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
31 | 6877721 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.8¢ | 4261302 | 13 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
31 | 6877721 | 0.007 |
33 | 45124111 | 0.006 |
16 | 32250199 | 0.005 |
9 | 8654750 | 0.004 |
4 | 2960000 | 0.003 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.008 | 4061303 | 12 |
0.009 | 4323654 | 9 |
0.010 | 2973131 | 21 |
0.011 | 4747820 | 12 |
0.012 | 4135705 | 7 |
Last trade - 10.00am 02/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AUZ (ASX) Chart |