Hmmm ...I'm assuming THEY refers to the big shareholders - Tribe, Sietsma, McCusker, Barton, Hocking. So, talking to your advisor do you think that is a possibility/probability. Their behaviour to date has been respectful of smaller shareholders. With no premium they would need to soak up a further 1b shares (approx) to enforce compulsory acquisition (I think). They already account for about 60% so a further 30% to be bought to trigger compulsory. Do you think THEY would do that to shareholders? After nearly 18 years I wouldn't be at all happy to part with my shares at 6-7c. In fact I suspect I would be outraged if I was compelled to sell my shares at that price. You've made me very nervous.
Please disregard if I have read this all wrong.
Ann: PK STUDY RESULTS MOVE RP11 CLOSER TO FIRST IN HUMAN TRIALS, page-99
Add PYC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
19.0¢ |
Change
0.005(2.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $886.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 18.5¢ | 19.0¢ | 17.5¢ | $508.8K | 2.763M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 118941 | 18.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 19.0¢ | 183634 | 2 |
| Last trade - 16.10pm 14/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PYC (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable