We are coming at this from two very different angles, and it is exhausting. You are fixated on academic issues i.e. difference between IP, patent, trademark etc. I am focused on the value proposition in an acquistion/sale scenario.
It completely misses the point that I raised when @vfpa5000000 was saying that Team17 might seek to acquire PLY at a 50-100% premium when I questioned why pay such a premium for a company that does not own anything particularly valuable?
Please try to stay at least two steps behind.
Ann: PlaySide & Team17 sign Long-Term Publishing Agreement, page-46
Add PLY (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
90.5¢ |
Change
0.005(0.56%) |
Mkt cap ! $369.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 90.5¢ | 93.5¢ | 90.0¢ | $330.8K | 361.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18000 | 90.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 91.0¢ | 94783 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 03/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
90.5¢ |
Change
0.005 ( 0.69 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 90.5¢ | 93.5¢ | 90.0¢ | 893930 | ||
| Last updated 15.59pm 03/06/2024 ? | |||||
| PLY (ASX) Chart |