We are coming at this from two very different angles, and it is exhausting. You are fixated on academic issues i.e. difference between IP, patent, trademark etc. I am focused on the value proposition in an acquistion/sale scenario.
It completely misses the point that I raised when @vfpa5000000 was saying that Team17 might seek to acquire PLY at a 50-100% premium when I questioned why pay such a premium for a company that does not own anything particularly valuable?
Please try to stay at least two steps behind.
We are coming at this from two very different angles, and it is...
Add PLY (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
89.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(1.66%) |
Mkt cap ! $363.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 91.0¢ | 91.0¢ | 88.0¢ | $271.6K | 303.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1136 | 88.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 89.0¢ | 3469 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
89.5¢ |
Change
-0.015 ( 1.10 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 91.0¢ | 91.0¢ | 88.0¢ | 228128 | ||
| Last updated 15.59pm 04/06/2024 ? | |||||
| PLY (ASX) Chart |