Th other thing I find significant is that there appears to be clear segregation in the communication material between the mining and lithium seller. SYA being the miner and PLL being the lithium provider. Why the segregation like this? Should SYA not have referenced lithium in its name given the world is falling over itself for supply- it is it a carefully curated strategy to have one as miner (to attract grants in mining) and the other to act as lithium supplier to access USD funding. I don't know but I would prefer to see SYA reference "Sayona Lithium" in all of its announcements. Presumably SYA would not need PLL to access USA $ funding available under IRA?
Th other thing I find significant is that there appears to be...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 95 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.4¢ |
Change
0.001(3.03%) |
Mkt cap ! $349.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.3¢ | 3.5¢ | 3.3¢ | $1.368M | 40.39M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | 13154629 | 3.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4¢ | 636953 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |