Ann: Porphyry Copper Prospects , page-11

"the value of SIR is based on a extensive drilling program that has supposedly worked towards a very large JORC compliant resource. Implying the same type of value based on historical data seems a stretch."

Was not implying that the value can be immediately transposed, I was stating that based on the historical grades and of course depending on the size of the deposit, Mantle could be revalued in a very short period of time as SIR was after short period of exploration.

In no way was a saying that MNM was now worth 60x its current capitalisation. Not sure why I need to explain this in so much depth, my orginal post only refered to the grades stated in the announcement and you need more information than the grades to make a fair comparison.