Also I think you have to consider the time factor for big...

  1. rlj
    557 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 211
    Also I think you have to consider the time factor for big pharma.

    AD214 has taken a decade to get to this point. Let's say 3 years have been wasted along the way for various reasons, but that's still 7 years from discovery to end of Phase 1.

    With patents running out and an ever increasing need to keep the revenue streams ticking along, for an upfront payment of $45m big pharma can save themselves not only the cost of developing the drug ($45m to date), but also the 7 years of development, not to mention mitigation of the risk involved, as there is no guarantee that even after 7 years they could get a drug ready to start phase 2, with a safety profile and novel mode of action in a multi billion dollar market.

    Therefore with that in mind I don't think the best light to view the upfront is against current MC, I believe it's against the time and risk mitigation for big pharma in getting an alternative drug to this stage of development, therefore in that light, a $45m upfront and another $45m for phase II trials, so under $100m gets you a drug that in three years could be starting a Phase III in a multi billion dollar indication with little or no competition


    Last edited by rlj: 25/03/24
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
0.2¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $2.225M
Open High Low Value Volume
0.2¢ 0.2¢ 0.2¢ $3.333K 1.666M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
13 6101496 0.2¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
0.3¢ 15952546 18
View Market Depth
Last trade - 15.55pm 30/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
1AD (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.