Ann: Positive initial results of AVO Analysis 3D Seismic Data, page-12

Sorry I should’ve linked the report.I seem to be having trouble pasting the link here but if you search for the Judith-1 Well on the Vic govt’s dept of primary industries database the well report will come up.

I’ll paste a section that mentions the reservoir. It’s bad formatting but it is straight from the report. The last sentence is what interests me about the reservoir quality.

if this reads differently to anyone I am open to it

999 Location 0001 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW=Judith 1 is an exploration well, drilled approximately 12 km to the East of Tuna
999 Location 0081 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW= Platform, 4.2 km NW of Kipper 1 and 6.5 km of Kipper 2.
999 Objective 0001 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW=The primary objective of Judith 1 was to test the top of the Golden Beach Group
999 Objective 0081 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW=for a possible northerly extension of the Kipper Field beyond the Kipper fault.
999 Summary 0001 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW=Plugged and abandoned, dry. Judith 1 tested a valid structure at the lower Golde
999 Summary 0081 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW=n Beach level, contained non-producible hydrocarbons. It all so showed that the
999 Summary 0161 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW=Kipper Field does not extend north of the Kipper Fault. Judith 1 demonstrated th
999 Summary 0241 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW=e sealing potential of the Kipper Shale, but also severely downgraded the hydroc
999 Summary 0321 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW=arbon potential of the Lower Golden Beach Group along the Rosedale Fault margin,
999 Summary 0401 01 HDR GA NPD_REMARKW= due to the poor reservoir quality of the sands.