ah hah, thanks for pointing this out. I missed it....

ah hah, thanks for pointing this out. I missed it.

Unfortunately, I have to be honest - I'm now wondering how they chose these samples. Its is clearly not random - evidenced by the average grade of the samples being higher than the average grade of the reported resource.

Again, I'm 99% sure there's no foul play here, but why not just share the methodology with us? as you say, its the little details like this that's preventing the knowledgeable big money players from getting involved. Just prove to us the samples weren't cherry-picked, is it that much to expect? When you get such spectacular results, you really need to show these things, its standard practice.