What I'm saying is...If you feel part of that is wrong, feel free to point out which part. Otherwise it's just the ignorant babbling of someone who can't reason objectively about something they're invested in.This is fine as an alternative explanation but doesn't change any of what I've written. The fact that they use the term statistically significant is extremely unsettling from an ethical standpoint.
This is fine as an alternative explanation but doesn't change...
Add IMU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
8.2¢ |
Change
-0.003(3.53%) |
Mkt cap ! $600.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 8.5¢ | 8.6¢ | 8.2¢ | $1.246M | 14.84M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 446526 | 8.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3¢ | 535664 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 03/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
8.2¢ |
Change
-0.003 ( 2.38 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 8.6¢ | 8.6¢ | 8.2¢ | 4518456 | ||
| Last updated 15.57pm 03/05/2024 ? | |||||
| IMU (ASX) Chart |