Look instead of debating why they used 0.1 or where someone uses 0.05 or even 0.00001! It is better to understand the use of p-values and hypothesis testing in statistics. In layman's terms, 0.1 means that there is a 10% probability that the results are random and not from the drug used.
So yes, 0.05 would be better, even so, 0.00000001. However, further testing is sure to be done and I am sure if someone offered you a drug with a 90% probability that it could help you (in addition to chemotherapy). Must would jump at that! But yet, there is more to review than just the p-value as that is only telling you whether current drug a (chemotherapy alone) is different to drug b (HER-Vaxx plus chemotherapy).
Ann: Positive New HER-Vaxx HERIZON Data Presented at ESMO Asia, page-31
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IMU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
5.7¢ |
Change
0.003(5.56%) |
Mkt cap ! $417.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 5.5¢ | 5.8¢ | 5.2¢ | $2.499M | 45.00M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1921794 | 5.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7¢ | 1368288 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IMU (ASX) Chart |