A 49% cost advantage would be very nice indeed...and if you are using the cost of some of the existing producers, you are not far off:
Currently, EcoGraf cost sits between 5% and 50%
Chinas 'high quality' production costs were sitting between US$2.5-$3,000, considering the cost of HF has steadily gone up since then, a 50%
cost-saving via EcoGraf method might not be far fetched...but regardless of cost savings, as long as we don't become more expensive compared to existing producers, the HF Free point will make all the difference.
Then we have the additional cost advantage that our process does not damage the fines and there is a market for the product, especially when you know it will be a very high purity product... and considering that ~50% of the initial feedstock ends up as fines byproduct, that is a very big advantage.
All IMO
