@dizzan
I think in context of doing a measured PFS, it's about proving viability - and I can understand this is almost a mismatch in expectation for the market, especially when we're expecting huge numbers and flashing margins.
I.e. we're better off/there's no difference in proving viability of a small maiden resource, than we would for an entire 6b tonnes of resource.
We also need to keep in mind Razorback is our flagship project. It's the initial flame, of this bonfire
And practically, the reserve is based on what they have JORC'd at the moment within Razorback. In the next steps section of PFS, they state they plan to expand this in proximal drilling programs.
@Realinvestor1
Hey man, I really appreciate your work above.
May I bother you for a rough improved case (Optimal capex/ selective mining and Nextore) annual cash flow? Based on 150 IO/2.7mtpa?
I'm trying to figure out actual payback period before we can grow.
/how fast can we expand.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MGT
- Ann: Positive PFS Results for Razorback Iron Ore Project
Ann: Positive PFS Results for Razorback Iron Ore Project, page-273
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 573 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MGT (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
18.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $18.93M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
18.5¢ | 18.5¢ | 17.0¢ | $153.2K | 858.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 16666 | 18.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
19.5¢ | 4781 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 16666 | 0.180 |
1 | 4000 | 0.175 |
2 | 70000 | 0.170 |
3 | 61200 | 0.165 |
1 | 3000 | 0.160 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.195 | 4781 | 2 |
0.200 | 132206 | 3 |
0.205 | 49999 | 1 |
0.210 | 27500 | 1 |
0.220 | 12000 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.38pm 02/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MGT (ASX) Chart |