Ummmm according to the figures, the doctors agreed with RAP Approx 7x% of the time, However for 33% of the cases the doctors couldn't agree with themselves...... that means that in a busy clinical setting, RAP got it right 7x%. Whereas two doctors reviewing cases with all the tests would get it wrong 15% of the time (33% x 50-50 call) meaning that they would only get it right 85% of the time. So 7x% in busy clinical vs 8x% in case review. Reckon the doctors % would drop in a busy clinical.
NOTE that this is SOFTWARE that can be improved based on learnings and testing and recoding/better algorithms. (think of Tesla braking results that were immediately fixed with an update).
The stethoscope is at the peak of its development cycle, it can't be improved further, whereas RAP is at the start of its development cycle and if allowed will only get better.....i.e. What if you connected a stethoscope to a device with RAP on it, reckon it would improve results????
Ann: Positive Preliminary Results from SMARTCOUGH-C-2 Study, page-132
Currently unlisted. Proposed listing date: 4 SEPTEMBER 2024 #
