One question I have; if accuracy is below 80% for a positive read, wouldn't the 20%+ variance automatically mean that a human diagnosis would still be required? And wouldn't that kind of defeat the object of the exercise?
One question I have; if accuracy is below 80% for a positive...
Currently unlisted. Proposed listing date: 4 SEPTEMBER 2024 #
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 340 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)