"They could have tested a range of humidities to get a viable...

"They could have tested a range of humidities to get a viable results, but no, let's not test the important things. How does it work in 10% humidity or 50% humidity or 100%?? If they only tested in near 100% humidity, it is a useless test as 100% humidity is not a standard occupied space.

The company can't just tweek the settings to produce hydroxyl free radicals in a dry environment!! There needs to be moisture in the air, or a separate source of hydrogen/water (H2O) to make hydroxyl radicals. In dry air the 'spark' of the unit can only create ozone and things like nitrous oxides."

Not sure why we keep going on about this humidity rubbish. This has already been addressed previously. Here it is again

The Myths

Myth #1: All hydroxyl generators require 60% humidity to be effective.

To start, there is a statement in the industry that all hydroxyl generators require 60% humidity to be effective. This is a myth and would render hydroxyl generators useless in many parts of the United States. Hydroxyl generators using patented technology will be effective with humidity as low as 5%, so no the humidity is not relevant.

Regarding the wiring and seals etc, more rubbish and fear mongering. For someone who doesn't have shares you seem to really want to try and put fear into anyone interested in the company. The company as a whole is a big let down. However, looks like they are starting to move forward (or sideways?), either way there is some movement and they haven't stopped engaging with OEMs. You may be correct that OEM's don't want to use the FRG+ but to keep coming back and saying the same uninformed rubbish is getting tiresome. Holders are hoping that these guys can get something happening we don't want to hear the same old argument you have over and over. The FRG+ unit doesn't need high humidity, it sends out small amounts of ozone, the process is done in a closed chamber so not to effect internal seals or wiring! Your "chicken little" arguments should be removed from the HC boards as none of what you say is substantiated. You are going on general Ozone and Hydroxyl generators with different technology.

FRG+ and Purifloh are trying to commercialize a unit that is safe to operate in an occupied room, has no problem generating the OH molecule in an enclosed chamber where the destruction of bacteria happens. Due too the device doing it's thing in an enclosed chamber humidity in the air is not a factor. 5% is enough. Will it produce larger amounts of OH in humid air, yes, does it need to be humid NO! Other devices do their work by producing O3 or OH and spewing it out into the air and letting the radicles break down the VOC in the room it is treating. So you are comparing apples with oranges. The other difference is in the power needed to do the job. By reports they could likely just have a rechargeable battery in the unit and run it that way if they wanted. A separate power source to the unit. But I don't believe that it is needed.

Will the company be able to get this off the ground, who knows? Do we still have 3 or 4 possible products that could be worth huge amounts of money as predicted by the Beer and Co report, yes. All areas are still in play. Water, Air and surface. Yes Is FRG+ unique? yes. Is using o3 and OH radicals unique? no. Is the way Po3 produced these radicals unique? Yes. Does it do it in a room and letting the chemical process happen in the air around us? No. Does the process happen inside the enclosed chamber and then mostly purified air come out? Yes. Shall we say it one more time. Does the process happen inside a closed chamber, and not sent out into the air for the process to happen in the air around us unlike other o3/OH units? Yes. Is it true the OH radical only lasts 2 seconds, so therefore being in an enclosed environment better than just being spewed out and disappearing in 2 seconds? Well IMO yes, you be the judge on that one.