would have been good if they showed a map so we can see where on...

would have been good if they showed a map so we can see where on their lease that e-w transect corresponds to and there is no north to south transect. They’re planning the deepest 900 m depth hole to the north, which is well beyond the depth of the VES results. Is that because the fresher overlying aquifer is much thicker and deeper to the north and much thicker than what is shown on their e-w transect?