Ann: Pre-Pilot Plant Performance Improvements & Upgrades Update, page-104

Unfortunately the article you posted has a lot of negative comments at the bottom from people who are either uninformed or who have other agendas . Such as for example

"I hope the $ 950 million is a mis-print.
This is abut a mad a scheme as anyone could dream up.
Confuses the offshore fuel cell initiatives which are legislatively required of vehicle manufactures to reduce inner city pollution - nothing whatsoever to do with CO2 emissions reductions.
How do you compress the hydrogen - takes more energy than virtually all other gasses. All the energy from the heat of compression is lost. Hydrogen permeates through steel. Can explode on impact - so a hydrogen tank is a sitting time bomb.
Liquid hydrogen is very difficult to store and transport and again takes even more energy to liquify.
Electrolysis wastes half the energy in producing oxygen. Still left with the need to compress and store the hydrogen.
This is one initiative we can be very confident will simply result in one huge write-off down the track.
Fuel cell technology has been around for many years as in Apollo program - so who is going to use them. Not the vehicle manufacturers who all have their own fuel cell programs in production.
If this sort of initiative had any value - which it doesn't why aren't Honda, Toyota, Mercedes, all lining up to fund it ?
It really is hard to believe that a Government would fall for funding a single $ for this program.
Hydrogen is an energy transport medium - it is not an energy source.
One of the first laws of thermodynamics to optimise efficiency is to use as few transformations as possible. Simply running a modern Atkinson cycle engine on CNG will produce much lower emissions than anything these lads can dream up via a hydrogen path."

Comments are invited from anyone who is registered. Just wondered if @Michaeljob could educate these morons by registering and giving them a better understanding of what HZR is all about. I don't think there's anyone else on this forum who could do that even half as well as well as he could.

The article mentions using renewable energy to generate hydrogen by electrolysis ("electrifying water" LOL) . They would be better using the renewables for generating the heat for the HZR process which would afford a carbon negative system.