Ego? Superiority? This is not a school yard - it is a forum where people share information and discuss investment opportunities. All I am asking is to cite your information and your reaction has gone off the rails.
I think you have misunderstood. Its not about clout or fake internet points. It is just about how information is shared. Label it, don't label it, I dont care. I recommend you do and it would be good practise for you to do so but I am not going to lose sleep over it.
Now if you want to discuss accuracy of ChatGPT, Gemini, Deepseek, or whatever, that is a different question. Lets discuss data sources of AI. EchoSolv, using Exclusive access to National Echo Database of Australia, and was trained on 200 million datapoint. In contrast what you have shared is limited in what it can "see" on the public internet on sites which allows it to be accessible, and it is purposefully hamstrung in its capability as a free AI. In your example it has interpreted what it "read" from 3 sites and has articulated an answer as it best sees fit. "As it best sees fit" is as often a hit as it is a miss. Just labeling it as AI is just a disclaimer for the reader.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)