Ann: Presentation - NWR Virtual Small Cap Resource Conference, page-75

Using WAFs one best year as a comparison against everyone else's LOM productions is a bit of a "fake data" approach (cherry picking WAF against everyone else's averages. So teh actual position of WAF current reserve, is a little higher on AISC and a little to the left of production.

The thing is, just using WAF's proposed LOM averages it still is an attractive proposition on a pictorial like this, so there's actually no need to do a cherry-picked comparison. No offense dude, its just that it's a bit of a Ramper/Pump-and-Dumper's approach to data when it's really unnecessary.