I broadly agree with what you're saying, and it's nice to read some posts from someone who has a technical understanding of engineering concepts.
A slight correction, you said 700 bar in your post but the premised pressure is actually about 250bar. 250 bar is about the same operating pressure as a scuba diving tank. So, for anyone who has ever picked up a scuba diving tank, they would know the sort of strength that this entails. Imagine a scuba tank the size of a ship.
I ran some numbers and I believe that the ship would burn about 30% of its cargo to do the round trip between Japan and Carnarvon. This is a lot.
The amount of energy these ships can carry is very small compared with LNG carriers. A liquid is way more dense than a compressed gas.
I don't believe the MOU will ever result in anything meaningful, because the numbers don't stack up. The energy density of compressed hydrogen is just way too low.
Some numbers:
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PV1
- Ann: PRL:Compressed Hydrogen Shipping Memorandum of Understanding
Ann: PRL:Compressed Hydrogen Shipping Memorandum of Understanding, page-12
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 69 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PV1 (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $11.98M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.9¢ | 2.1¢ | 1.9¢ | $3.038K | 154.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 8998 | 1.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.2¢ | 266999 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 8998 | 0.019 |
4 | 427532 | 0.018 |
8 | 833447 | 0.017 |
7 | 502706 | 0.016 |
1 | 100000 | 0.010 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.022 | 266999 | 2 |
0.023 | 3600 | 1 |
0.024 | 145833 | 2 |
0.025 | 44343 | 4 |
0.026 | 90400 | 2 |
Last trade - 14.45pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PV1 (ASX) Chart |