No, you misquote me. I never called you moronic. I said "some of the silly questioning in the last few weeks of J&J's continued involvment is nothing short of moronic".
What I get is frustrated with people like yourself posting misleading information, particularly given you own the stock. If you understood disclosure agreements, trial protocols and commercial agreements around trials, you wouldn't make statements like "J&J is just stringing this company along." What basis do you have for such a statement? They sponsored and paid for a trial that is conducted at arms length from both OCC and JNJ. What were you expecting from JNJ ahead of the results and what evidence do you have that "J&J is just stringing this company along."???
"A few years ago the company continually talked up the likelihood of a partnership withJ&J."
Did they? Show me that release?
"Last year or so, they have fallen silent on the matter".
No they didn't, they updated the market on the trial, partly because I pleaded with them repeatedly their communication to doubtful retail investors like yourself was poor. They gave us guidance early in the year on the trial early in the year, when it was fully recruited mid-year and disappointingly revealed we would not get an early data read out and would instead get a full results read in Q3 2021. Their communication is crap at times, but what do you expect from them? Its a trial. You are invested in bio-techs, you know this is a randomised controlled trial and there are degrees of seperationi for trial integrity. Once they or J&J decided no interim read-out what else could they say until results completed?
"As for this year bedger, you posted that August would be the month, then Q3"
The company shouted for 14 months that it would be Q3 2021. Sorry I didn't predict the delay that could be for any host of reasons that clearly the company didn't consider itself. Sorry that I am not omnipotent. Will try harder.
I take my forecast dates from the company, releases, investor presentations, AGM's, interviews, etc.. I don't make them up. I do a lot of work collating them and then sharing on here because the company's communication is poor, and there is then a lot of misinformed speculation on here.
Of course companies walk away from trials, but as I actually said, OCC would have to disclose it, and what company walks away from a four year trial a month or two before the results are out that it has paid for? That's is absurd. TO suggest so is moronic. No hard feelings MM.
Expand
(20min delay)