Depends on how they're calculating the emissions right?
I thought that they're counting the reduction due to Haber being lower intensity than the overseas supply that it replaces? If that's the case, the larger it gets, the more emissions it offsets (geotherm is not even part of that equation).
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- STX
- Ann: Project Haber Update
Ann: Project Haber Update, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
21.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $615.0M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
22.0¢ | 22.0¢ | 21.5¢ | $1.130M | 5.217M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
17 | 745901 | 21.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
22.0¢ | 1123287 | 15 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 348673 | 0.215 |
47 | 3850589 | 0.210 |
36 | 1667787 | 0.205 |
59 | 2982268 | 0.200 |
28 | 1962499 | 0.195 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.220 | 966742 | 11 |
0.225 | 927360 | 6 |
0.230 | 695300 | 18 |
0.235 | 1096909 | 11 |
0.240 | 478930 | 8 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
STX (ASX) Chart |