I am travelling a lot at the moment so I don't find much time to post on HC and certainly aren't going to bother going tit for tat with you on the IMU thread like some others tend to do as I have better things to do but I will say a couple of things in response....
No one doubts IMU need more money from somewhere for additional trials and yes it is likely to come from another CR if no license deals surface from big pharma but for an RAC holder to post multiple times day and night (weekends included) on a stock they don't hold after pumping RAC all the way down from the $3.68 highs is a joke - you must have a boring life .... I don't think investors in IMU need you to tell them 100 times a week of the risks associated with a 'speculative' biotech but yet here you are day in day out ??
A quick review of your posting history of the last 23 pages illuminates you have basically only posted on IMU and RAC - negative IMU and positive RAC .... and yet what is comical is that you have pumped RAC from the high $3.50 range claiming it was a screaming 'buy" or 'cracker' or in your case 'craker' (e.g. Post #: 57251136 ) when IMU have made more progress with the FDA on multiple fronts in comparison to RAC and IMU of course have multiple shots at goal rather than the one trick pony you promote.... sure IMU management could have done a number of things better but hey at least LC, PH and YF aren't wasting their valuable time that shareholders are paying them for critiquing and posting on other biotech HC stock forums like your CEO does ..... too funny
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)