Ann: Proposed issue of securities - OCC, page-14

I note that you're a holder. If you think the share price will be 37c in 2027 why are you holding? If you think it will be substantially above 0.37c in 2027 why on earth did you use 0.37c in your scenario?

I expect there is some correlation between the financial illiteracy in this country approximating 40% and the fact that 4 people presumably read this thread before "liking" your post.

Suffice to say:
1. I've already provided 2 posts indicating why I believe these options are likely to be "on top" of other payments in which case the services would not be "free" under any circumstances.
2. All holders on here are putting up with months if not years of opportunity cost from our entries between 30-40c on the hope and/or expectation that the share price will appreciate (significantly) between now and 2027. To the extent that shares and options are provided to others on generous terms BEFORE any such appreciation it materially dilutes the upside for the rest of us. Others have already pointed out the impact of ongoing retail selling into any good announcements.

If this latest share allocation is in consideration for some strategic service and is just a one-off then wonderful (as I've already mentioned) but if it's step 2 in a trend then I personally think that's a problem.

I hope this helps but frankly as much should already have been quite clear from the earlier posts.