I am not a Strike apologist I am afraid. I will not give them the benefit of the doubt any longer. Too many egregious claims over many years turning out to be no more than hot air. Why should I or anyone believe them now? It’s usual to give both permeability and porosity figures, pressures etc to allow investors to assess the quality of the well. Testing is not normal a mealy mouthed puff through a pre-existing production facility but the more usual rigorous testing using a test rig. Why was that not done here? What are RISC going to be asked to and able to certify?
Ann: Q4 FY24 Quarterly Report & Appendix 5B, page-135
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
23.0¢ |
Change
0.005(2.22%) |
Mkt cap ! $659.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 22.5¢ | 23.5¢ | 22.5¢ | $1.742M | 7.573M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 1201102 | 22.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0¢ | 124339 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 11/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |