I think the reality is they currently have plenty of cash to...

  1. 491 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 137
    I think the reality is they currently have plenty of cash to test and likely define what type of resource there is. Obviously a lot of drilling happening currently and will continue for the balance of the year.

    So if they are able to define or at least demonstrate a material resource (similar quantum to RNU, separate of Sugarloaf) then you would think a capital raise shouldn't be a big issue.

    I think we will know what the opportunity is with the current cash balance, and it's a huge potential market, so if there is a big resource to work with I don't see how having two big participants in the same location is a big issue. If anything, could make SA a hub for anode material, which provides the opportunity to leverage downstream opportunities.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
3.1¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $5.295M
Open High Low Value Volume
3.1¢ 3.1¢ 3.1¢ $4.259K 137.3K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
2 269000 3.0¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
3.1¢ 138465 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 14.59pm 30/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
ITM (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.