"
We would once again respectfully advise posters to be careful about what you post as your comments could potentially be in breach of HC TOU's. Wrong information posted on a public platform can potentially harm a company's reputation."
Hmm ... two very intriguing sentences! I could be mistaken but I thought it was up to the HC moderators to enforce the HC TOU's?
"
We would once again respectfully advise posters "
And may we all be enlightened as to whom you are referring to when you use the 'first person' plural pronoun "
we" please?
Interestingly, it is also an advisory that cuts both ways - I think. In fact, I would argue that any poster who is a declared representative of CGB would, in my opinion, have a greater legal responsibility to ensure that their information is very accurate. I think that most posters, in most instances, are merely expressing opinions.
And CGB is still not re-listed yet ... I see.
Any news on the crops?
Any news on the acquisitions?
Any news on the bauxite?
Any news on the potential bauxite sales to China?
Particularly in light of the following.
Pnina Feldman was quoted (below) in a QBL announcement dated 26 April 2018. I have bolded what I believe are the salient parts.
As an aside, I also note that this statement seems to use the word "potential" more than once as did the post to which I am replying
"
Comment from Pnina Feldman, Chairperson of QBL (https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ann-qbl-bauxite-team-in-china.4152697/)“
We are excited to finally see the light at the end of the tunnel for this project, with potential businessarrangements which we believe will turn our South Johnstone Bauxite deposit into the lucrativeproject that we have always anticipated it could become. The Company’s current trip to China shouldfurther these potential arrangements and partnerships that should establish South Johnstone as anexciting project that will benefit the Company and all shareholders.”
Must have been one hell of bright light or, an exceedingly long tunnel?
Look forward to hearing back.
