"Two sayings come to mind,1. "Fools rush in where angels fear to...

"Two sayings come to mind,
1. "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread".
2."If you speak words in haste, trouble will not be far behind."

I wonder how many shareholders feel that hackneyed cliches can possibly serve as balanced and erudite analysis of the data.

"Poking the bear"?

Is the "bear" the Quarterly report? My post referred to the data contained in the most recent Quarterly Report. If, there is dispute about the facts that I have referred to, then please debate the detail.

And for the benefit of the forum - I actually didn't reference any poster in my earlier post. I am not sure why this particular poster has responded on the basis that my post was directed towards them. It wasn't. And that is largely because I am of the view that any poster, who is listed in the top 20 shareholders, would find it exceedingly difficult to make a balanced assessment - particularly if the data includes less than desirable results. And a 57% drop in total revenue must surely be considered a less than desirable result - I would think.

For those who are neither "fools" nor "angels"

1. Are there any views on the "Lunar Holidays" and how that creates and or contributes to a 57% fall in receipts?

2. Are there any views on the percentage / level of spend on "administration and corporate" costs? See my earlier post for the figures.

3. Are there any views on the "logistical challenges" and how that can be reconciled against the "administration and corporate" spend?

"When I have something to say, I will add a post."

Thank you for the posting update and undoubtedly, that is how it is for all posters ... I imagine.