Have been having a re-read of some of your fabulous recent posts (it takes some digesting, - all the geological detail and explanations of things, excellently written I might add) and it is always a very rewarding exercise. Thanks again for your trouble taken in writing them.
Like a good number of posters here who have serious industry knowledge, the issue of drilling rate (number of rigs etc.) is repeated over and over again. When you speak to JP about this, why is this apparent good advice not taken up? Availability of drill rigs may or may not be a partial explanation, but can't be adequate as a full reason it seems. The theory it's to drag it all out intentionally for "salary" reasons doesn't wash with me either btw ... I don't believe that.
So what are the reasons (given)? Surely they would know enough targets to drill if they had 3 rigs working??? (Maybe not???)
Greater tempo and intensity would generate far more interest and activity with the share price - no harm done there for the company's causes either. So, what is behind it all? Any thoughts? JP must surely listen to the input of the likes of you and @helmenesh and your cronies???
(20min delay)