On first reading of the 250m strike conductor identified from the DHEM survey with a 75m range limit I assumed they had reached that interpretation by triangulating EM data from other holes. Whilst MAD196 is proximal to MAD200 its doubtful this is the case as it's not stated in the July 6 Ann. Otherwise, like you, I'm struggling to work out how they determined a 250m long conductor given the 75m radius limit of the DHEM.
Ann: Quarterly Activities and Cashflow Report, page-26
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.3¢ |
Change
-0.001(2.94%) |
Mkt cap ! $35.92M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.6¢ | 3.6¢ | 3.3¢ | $301.3K | 8.732M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 1979058 | 3.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4¢ | 255000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SGQ (ASX) Chart |